Formula, in Strength Training
Velocity-Based 1RM Formula
Velocity-Based Training (VBT) estimates 1RM without grinding to a true single. Bar speed at the concentric peak has a near-linear relationship with %1RM that's lift-specific. Each lift has a Minimum Velocity Threshold (MVT) — the speed corresponding to a true 1RM. Working backwards: measure bar speed at a sub-max load, fit a line through 2-3 data points, extrapolate to MVT. Accuracy is ±2-5% vs a measured 1RM.
4 variables. Published May 14, 2026. By AI Fit Hub.
%1RM = a · velocity_m_s + b
where a, b are lift-specific regression coefficients
MVT (minimum velocity threshold):
Bench: 0.17 m/s
Back squat: 0.30 m/s
Front squat: 0.27 m/s
Deadlift: 0.15 m/s
Military press: 0.19 m/s Variables
velocity_m_s
Mean concentric velocity
Bar speed in meters per second during the concentric phase of the lift. Measured with a linear position transducer (e.g., Tendo, GymAware) or video analysis (PowerLift, MyLift apps). 'Mean' not 'peak' — the average velocity through the full ROM.
MVT
Minimum Velocity Threshold
Mean concentric velocity at true 1RM for this lift. Lift-specific because biomechanics + muscle group size + sticking-point position vary. Generally: smaller-muscle lifts have lower MVT (slower true max).
a
Slope coefficient
How fast bar speed drops as load increases. Lift-specific. González-Badillo 2010 published per-lift regression coefficients.
b
Intercept
%1RM at zero velocity (extrapolated). Always close to 100% by construction.
Step by step
- 1
Pick a lift with a published MVT (bench, squat, deadlift, military press).
Back squat, MVT = 0.30 m/s.
- 2
Warm up to ~50% estimated 1RM. Use a tracker (e.g., PowerLift app, Tendo). Record mean concentric velocity for one rep.
100 kg squat: mean velocity 1.05 m/s.
- 3
Add 10-15% load. Record again.
120 kg: 0.85 m/s. 140 kg: 0.65 m/s.
- 4
Fit a line through the 3 (velocity, %1RM) points. Solve for the load at v = MVT.
Linear fit: %1RM ≈ 145 − 100 × velocity. At v = 0.30: %1RM = 115% of measured 140 kg → 1RM ≈ 161 kg.
- 5
Cross-check against an Epley/Brzycki estimate from same sets. If within 5%, trust the VBT estimate. If diverging, recalibrate.
Last set 140 kg × 3 reps to RPE 9 → Epley: 154 kg. VBT: 161 kg. Average: 158 kg working estimate.
Worked example
Powerlifter testing back squat 1RM via VBT instead of grinding to a true single
Lift
Back squat (MVT = 0.30 m/s)
Set 1
100 kg @ 1.05 m/s
Set 2
120 kg @ 0.85 m/s
Set 3
140 kg @ 0.65 m/s
Linear fit: %1RM ≈ 145 − 100 · v At v = 0.30 m/s (MVT for squat): %1RM = 145 − 30 = 115% of 140 kg Estimated 1RM = 1.15 × 140 = 161 kg
1RM estimate ~161 kg without a true max attempt. Save the CNS hit. Repeat the protocol weekly to track training response without grinding singles. Accuracy ±2-5% per González-Badillo's published validation data.
Common variations
Run the numbers next
- Strength One-Rep Max Calculator
Estimate one-rep max with Epley, Brzycki, and Lombardi formulas.
- Strength Strength Percentile Calculator
Find out where your squat, bench, deadlift, or OHP ranks against other lifters by bodyweight and sex.
- Strength RPE to Percentage Converter
Convert RPE and reps to percentage of 1RM with a full interactive RPE chart based on the Tuchscherer table.
Sources
- González-Badillo & Sánchez-Medina (2010). Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. , International Journal of Sports Medicine — foundational VBT/MVT paper
- Sánchez-Medina, Pallarés, Pérez & González-Badillo (2017). Estimation of relative load from bar velocity in the full back squat exercise. , Sports Medicine International Open — back squat regression validation
- Pérez-Castilla, Piepoli, Delgado-García, Garrido-Blanca & García-Ramos (2019). Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity. , Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research — device validation
- Banyard, Nosaka & Haff (2017). Reliability and validity of the load-velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. , Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research — validity vs measured 1RM